NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super vs MiniMax: MiniMax M2: Which AI Model Is Better?
Updated March 24, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
Quick Verdict
MiniMax: MiniMax M2 leads in intelligence with a score of 49.6 vs 36.0. NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super is 2.6x cheaper at $0.10/1M tokens vs $0.26/1M. For speed, NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super wins at 402 tok/s vs 44 tok/s.
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Metric | NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super | MiniMax: MiniMax M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | 36.0 | 49.6 |
| Coding Score | 31.2 | 41.9 |
| Math Score | N/A | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | 402 tok/s | 44 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 0.59s | 2.03s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $0.10 | $0.26 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $0.50 | $1.00 |
| Context Window | 262K | 197K |
| Max Output Tokens | N/A | 197K |
| Input Modalities | Text | Text |
| Output Modalities | Text | Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |
Detailed Analysis
Intelligence & Quality
MiniMax: MiniMax M2 outperforms NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super on the Artificial Analysis intelligence index with a score of 49.6 compared to 36.0. For coding tasks, MiniMax: MiniMax M2 has the edge with a coding score of 41.9 vs 31.2.
Speed & Latency
NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super generates output significantly faster at 402 tok/s compared to MiniMax: MiniMax M2's 44 tok/s, making it 9.2x faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 0.59s for NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super vs 2.03s for MiniMax: MiniMax M2, which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.
Pricing
NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super is more affordable at $0.10/1M input tokens ($0.50/1M output), while MiniMax: MiniMax M2 costs $0.26/1M input ($1.00/1M output). That makes MiniMax: MiniMax M2 2.6x more expensive per token, which can add up significantly at scale. For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super would cost approximately $0.60/month vs $1.53/month for MiniMax: MiniMax M2 in input costs alone.
Context Window
NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super offers a larger context window at 262K tokens compared to MiniMax: MiniMax M2's 197K.
Best Use Cases
Choose NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super when you need faster output (402 tok/s), lower cost. Choose MiniMax: MiniMax M2 when you need higher intelligence (49.6), stronger coding performance (41.9).
Choose NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super if:
- ✓You need faster throughput (402 tok/s vs 44 tok/s)
- ✓You want lower latency (0.59s vs 2.03s TTFT)
- ✓Budget is a concern ($0.10/1M vs $0.26/1M)
Choose MiniMax: MiniMax M2 if:
- ✓You need higher intelligence (score: 49.6 vs 36.0)
- ✓You prioritize coding performance (score: 41.9 vs 31.2)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super better than MiniMax: MiniMax M2 for coding?
MiniMax: MiniMax M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks (41.9 vs 31.2), making it the better choice for programming tasks.
Which is cheaper, NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super or MiniMax: MiniMax M2?
NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.10/1M input tokens vs $0.26/1M for MiniMax: MiniMax M2.
Is NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super faster than MiniMax: MiniMax M2?
NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super is faster, producing output at 402 tok/s compared to MiniMax: MiniMax M2's 44 tok/s.
Can NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super process images?
No, NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super does not support image input. Neither model supports image input.
Which has a larger context window, NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super or MiniMax: MiniMax M2?
NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super has a larger context window at 262K compared to MiniMax: MiniMax M2's 197K.
Should I use NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super or MiniMax: MiniMax M2?
It depends on your priorities. MiniMax: MiniMax M2 scores higher on intelligence (49.6), but NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super may be better for specific use cases like budget-conscious projects or speed-critical applications.
Related Comparisons
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis
Data last synced: March 24, 2026