NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools: Which AI Model Is Better?
Updated March 24, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
Quick Verdict
Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools leads in intelligence with a score of 57.2 vs 36.0. NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super is 20.0x cheaper at $0.10/1M tokens vs $2.00/1M. For speed, NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super wins at 402 tok/s vs 117 tok/s.
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Metric | NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super | Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | 36.0 | 57.2 |
| Coding Score | 31.2 | 55.5 |
| Math Score | N/A | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | 402 tok/s | 117 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 0.59s | 21.91s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $0.10 | $2.00 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $0.50 | $12 |
| Context Window | 262K | 1.0M |
| Max Output Tokens | N/A | 66K |
| Input Modalities | Text | Text + Audio + Image + Video + File |
| Output Modalities | Text | Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |
Detailed Analysis
Intelligence & Quality
Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools outperforms NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super on the Artificial Analysis intelligence index with a score of 57.2 compared to 36.0. For coding tasks, Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools has the edge with a coding score of 55.5 vs 31.2.
Speed & Latency
NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super generates output significantly faster at 402 tok/s compared to Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools's 117 tok/s, making it 3.4x faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 0.59s for NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super vs 21.91s for Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools, which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.
Pricing
NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super is more affordable at $0.10/1M input tokens ($0.50/1M output), while Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools costs $2.00/1M input ($12/1M output). That makes Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools 20.0x more expensive per token, which can add up significantly at scale. For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super would cost approximately $0.60/month vs $12.00/month for Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools in input costs alone.
Context Window
Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools offers a larger context window at 1.0M tokens compared to NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super's 262K. This means Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools can process roughly 524 pages of text in a single request vs 131 pages for NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super.
Best Use Cases
Choose NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super when you need faster output (402 tok/s), lower cost. Choose Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools when you need higher intelligence (57.2), stronger coding performance (55.5), larger context window (1.0M).
Choose NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super if:
- ✓You need faster throughput (402 tok/s vs 117 tok/s)
- ✓You want lower latency (0.59s vs 21.91s TTFT)
- ✓Budget is a concern ($0.10/1M vs $2.00/1M)
Choose Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools if:
- ✓You need higher intelligence (score: 57.2 vs 36.0)
- ✓You prioritize coding performance (score: 55.5 vs 31.2)
- ✓You need a larger context window (1.0M vs 262K)
- ✓You need image understanding (Supports image input)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super better than Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools for coding?
Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools scores higher on coding benchmarks (55.5 vs 31.2), making it the better choice for programming tasks.
Which is cheaper, NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super or Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools?
NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.10/1M input tokens vs $2.00/1M for Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools.
Is NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super faster than Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools?
NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super is faster, producing output at 402 tok/s compared to Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools's 117 tok/s.
Can NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super process images?
No, NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super does not support image input. However, Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools does support images.
Which has a larger context window, NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super or Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools?
Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools has a larger context window at 1.0M compared to NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super's 262K.
Should I use NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super or Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools?
It depends on your priorities. Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools scores higher on intelligence (57.2), but NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super may be better for specific use cases like budget-conscious projects or speed-critical applications.
Related Comparisons
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis
Data last synced: March 24, 2026