NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash: Which AI Model Is Better?
Updated March 24, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
Quick Verdict
NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super leads in intelligence with a score of 36.0 vs 19.4. NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super is 3.0x cheaper at $0.10/1M tokens vs $0.30/1M.
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Metric | NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super | Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | 36.0 | 19.4 |
| Coding Score | 31.2 | 14.5 |
| Math Score | N/A | 46.7 |
| Speed (tok/s) | 402 tok/s | 343 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 0.59s | 0.31s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $0.10 | $0.30 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $0.50 | $2.50 |
| Context Window | 262K | 1.0M |
| Max Output Tokens | N/A | 66K |
| Input Modalities | Text | File + Image + Text + Audio + Video |
| Output Modalities | Text | Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |
Detailed Analysis
Intelligence & Quality
NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super outperforms Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash on the Artificial Analysis intelligence index with a score of 36.0 compared to 19.4. For coding tasks, NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super has the edge with a coding score of 31.2 vs 14.5.
Speed & Latency
Both models deliver similar output speeds: NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super at 402 tok/s and Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash at 343 tok/s. Time to first token is 0.31s for Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash vs 0.59s for NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super, which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.
Pricing
NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super is more affordable at $0.10/1M input tokens ($0.50/1M output), while Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.30/1M input ($2.50/1M output). That makes Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash 3.0x more expensive per token, which can add up significantly at scale. For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super would cost approximately $0.60/month vs $1.80/month for Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash in input costs alone.
Context Window
Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash offers a larger context window at 1.0M tokens compared to NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super's 262K. This means Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash can process roughly 524 pages of text in a single request vs 131 pages for NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super.
Best Use Cases
Choose NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super when you need higher intelligence (36.0), stronger coding performance (31.2), lower cost. Choose Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash when you need larger context window (1.0M).
Choose NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super if:
- ✓You need higher intelligence (score: 36.0 vs 19.4)
- ✓You prioritize coding performance (score: 31.2 vs 14.5)
- ✓Budget is a concern ($0.10/1M vs $0.30/1M)
Choose Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash if:
- ✓You want lower latency (0.31s vs 0.59s TTFT)
- ✓You need a larger context window (1.0M vs 262K)
- ✓You need image understanding (Supports image input)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super better than Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash for coding?
NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super scores higher on coding benchmarks (31.2 vs 14.5), making it the better choice for programming tasks.
Which is cheaper, NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super or Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash?
NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.10/1M input tokens vs $0.30/1M for Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash.
Is NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super faster than Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash?
NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super is faster, producing output at 402 tok/s compared to Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash's 343 tok/s.
Can NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super process images?
No, NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super does not support image input. However, Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash does support images.
Which has a larger context window, NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super or Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash has a larger context window at 1.0M compared to NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super's 262K.
Should I use NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super or Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash?
It depends on your priorities. NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super scores higher on intelligence (36.0), but Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash may be better for specific use cases like budget-conscious projects or speed-critical applications.
Related Comparisons
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis
Data last synced: March 24, 2026