Updated March 25, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro and Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview) are virtually tied on intelligence (49.2 vs 48.4). Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro is 2.0x cheaper at $1.00/1M tokens vs $2.00/1M. For speed, Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview) wins at 119 tok/s vs 0 tok/s.
| Metric | Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro | Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview) |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | 49.2 | 48.4 |
| Coding Score | 41.4 | 46.5 |
| Math Score | N/A | 95.7 |
| Speed (tok/s) | 0 tok/s | 119 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 0.00s | 21.66s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $1.00 | $2.00 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $3.00 | $12 |
| Context Window | 1.0M |
Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro and Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview) perform similarly on overall intelligence, scoring 49.2 and 48.4 respectively. For coding tasks, Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview) has the edge with a coding score of 46.5 vs 41.4.
Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview) generates output significantly faster at 119 tok/s compared to Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro's 0 tok/s, making it Infinityx faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 0.00s for Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro vs 21.66s for Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview), which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.
Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro is more affordable at $1.00/1M input tokens ($3.00/1M output), while Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview) costs $2.00/1M input ($12/1M output). For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro would cost approximately $6.00/month vs $12.00/month for Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview) in input costs alone.
Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro offers a larger context window at 1.0M tokens compared to Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview)'s 66K. This means Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro can process roughly 524 pages of text in a single request vs 33 pages for Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview). For output length, Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro can generate up to 131K tokens per response vs 33K for Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview).
Choose Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro when you need lower cost, larger context window (1.0M). Choose Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview) when you need stronger coding performance (46.5), faster output (119 tok/s).
Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview) scores higher on coding benchmarks (46.5 vs 41.4), making it the better choice for programming tasks.
Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $1.00/1M input tokens vs $2.00/1M for Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview).
Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview) is faster, producing output at 119 tok/s compared to Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro's 0 tok/s.
No, Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro does not support image input. However, Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview) does support images.
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis
Data last synced: March 25, 2026
| 66K |
| Max Output Tokens | 131K | 33K |
| Input Modalities | Text | Image + Text |
| Output Modalities | Text | Image + Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |
Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro has a larger context window at 1.0M compared to Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview)'s 66K.
Both models perform similarly on intelligence benchmarks. Choose based on specific needs: pricing, speed, context window, or provider ecosystem.