Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads in intelligence with a score of 57.2 vs 18.2.
| Metric | Sarvam 105B (high) | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | 18.2 | 57.2 |
| Coding Score | 9.8 | 55.5 |
| Math Score | N/A | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | 96 tok/s | 113 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 1.55s | 23.84s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | Free | $2.00 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | Free | $12 |
| Context Window | N/A | 1.0M |
| Max Output Tokens | N/A | N/A |
| Input Modalities | Text | Audio + File + Image + Text + Video |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview outperforms Sarvam 105B (high) on the intelligence index with a score of 57.2 compared to 18.2. For coding tasks, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the edge with a coding score of 55.5 vs 9.8.
Both models deliver similar output speeds: Sarvam 105B (high) at 96 tok/s and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview at 113 tok/s. Time to first token is 1.55s for Sarvam 105B (high) vs 23.84s for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.
Sarvam 105B (high) is completely free, while Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $2.00/1M input tokens and $12/1M output tokens.
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when you need higher intelligence (57.2), stronger coding performance (55.5).
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks (55.5 vs 9.8), making it the better choice for programming tasks.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is faster, producing output at 113 tok/s compared to Sarvam 105B (high)'s 96 tok/s.
No, Sarvam 105B (high) does not support image input. However, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview does support images.
It depends on your priorities. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on intelligence (57.2), but Sarvam 105B (high) may be better for specific use cases like cost savings or speed-critical applications.
Data last synced: March 26, 2026
| Output Modalities | Text | Text |
| Free Tier | Yes | No |