Auto Router vs Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview): Which AI Model Is Better?
Updated March 24, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
Quick Verdict
Both Auto Router and Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview) are competitive AI models. See the detailed comparison below to find which best fits your needs.
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Metric | Auto Router | Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview) |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | N/A | 48.4 |
| Coding Score | N/A | 46.5 |
| Math Score | N/A | 95.7 |
| Speed (tok/s) | N/A | 119 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | N/A | 21.66s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | <$0.01 | $2.00 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | <$0.01 | $12 |
| Context Window | 2M | 66K |
| Max Output Tokens | N/A | 33K |
| Input Modalities | Text + Image + Audio + File + Video | Image + Text |
| Output Modalities | Text + Image | Image + Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |
Detailed Analysis
Context Window
Auto Router offers a larger context window at 2M tokens compared to Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview)'s 66K. This means Auto Router can process roughly 1000 pages of text in a single request vs 33 pages for Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview).
Best Use Cases
Choose Auto Router when you need larger context window (2M).
Choose Auto Router if:
- ✓You need a larger context window (2M vs 66K)
Frequently Asked Questions
Can Auto Router process images?
Yes, Auto Router supports image input. Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview) also supports images.
Which has a larger context window, Auto Router or Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview)?
Auto Router has a larger context window at 2M compared to Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview)'s 66K.
Related Comparisons
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis
Data last synced: March 24, 2026