Updated March 25, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
OpenAI: GPT-5.2 leads in intelligence with a score of 51.3 vs 48.4. For speed, Google: Gemini 3 Pro Preview wins at 116 tok/s vs 69 tok/s.
| Metric | OpenAI: GPT-5.2 | Google: Gemini 3 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | 51.3 | 48.4 |
| Coding Score | 48.7 | 46.5 |
| Math Score | 99.0 | 95.7 |
| Speed (tok/s) | 69 tok/s | 116 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 72.74s | 25.53s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $1.75 | $2.00 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $14 | $12 |
| Context Window | 400K |
OpenAI: GPT-5.2 outperforms Google: Gemini 3 Pro Preview on the Artificial Analysis intelligence index with a score of 51.3 compared to 48.4. For coding tasks, OpenAI: GPT-5.2 has the edge with a coding score of 48.7 vs 46.5. In mathematical reasoning, OpenAI: GPT-5.2 leads with 99.0 compared to Google: Gemini 3 Pro Preview's 95.7.
Google: Gemini 3 Pro Preview generates output significantly faster at 116 tok/s compared to OpenAI: GPT-5.2's 69 tok/s, making it 1.7x faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 25.53s for Google: Gemini 3 Pro Preview vs 72.74s for OpenAI: GPT-5.2, which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.
OpenAI: GPT-5.2 is more affordable at $1.75/1M input tokens ($14/1M output), while Google: Gemini 3 Pro Preview costs $2.00/1M input ($12/1M output). For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, OpenAI: GPT-5.2 would cost approximately $10.50/month vs $12.00/month for Google: Gemini 3 Pro Preview in input costs alone.
Google: Gemini 3 Pro Preview offers a larger context window at 1.0M tokens compared to OpenAI: GPT-5.2's 400K. This means Google: Gemini 3 Pro Preview can process roughly 524 pages of text in a single request vs 200 pages for OpenAI: GPT-5.2. For output length, OpenAI: GPT-5.2 can generate up to 128K tokens per response vs 66K for Google: Gemini 3 Pro Preview.
Choose OpenAI: GPT-5.2 when you need higher intelligence (51.3), stronger coding performance (48.7). Choose Google: Gemini 3 Pro Preview when you need faster output (116 tok/s), larger context window (1.0M).
OpenAI: GPT-5.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks (48.7 vs 46.5), making it the better choice for programming tasks.
OpenAI: GPT-5.2 is cheaper at $1.75/1M input tokens vs $2.00/1M for Google: Gemini 3 Pro Preview.
Google: Gemini 3 Pro Preview is faster, producing output at 116 tok/s compared to OpenAI: GPT-5.2's 69 tok/s.
Yes, OpenAI: GPT-5.2 supports image input. Google: Gemini 3 Pro Preview also supports images.
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis
Data last synced: March 25, 2026
| 1.0M |
| Max Output Tokens | 128K | 66K |
| Input Modalities | File + Image + Text | Text + Image + File + Audio + Video |
| Output Modalities | Text | Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |
Google: Gemini 3 Pro Preview has a larger context window at 1.0M compared to OpenAI: GPT-5.2's 400K.
It depends on your priorities. OpenAI: GPT-5.2 scores higher on intelligence (51.3), but Google: Gemini 3 Pro Preview may be better for specific use cases like budget-conscious projects or speed-critical applications.