Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
GPT-5.4 (xhigh) leads in intelligence with a score of 57.2 vs 9.0.
| Metric | Mistral Medium | GPT-5.4 (xhigh) |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | 9.0 | 57.2 |
| Coding Score | N/A | 57.3 |
| Math Score | N/A | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | 73 tok/s | 77 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 0.40s | 181.82s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $2.75 | $2.50 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $8.10 | $15 |
| Context Window | N/A | N/A |
| Max Output Tokens | N/A | N/A |
| Input Modalities | Text | Text |
GPT-5.4 (xhigh) outperforms Mistral Medium on the intelligence index with a score of 57.2 compared to 9.0.
Both models deliver similar output speeds: Mistral Medium at 73 tok/s and GPT-5.4 (xhigh) at 77 tok/s. Time to first token is 0.40s for Mistral Medium vs 181.82s for GPT-5.4 (xhigh), which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.
GPT-5.4 (xhigh) is more affordable at $2.50/1M input tokens ($15/1M output), while Mistral Medium costs $2.75/1M input ($8.10/1M output). For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, Mistral Medium would cost approximately $16.50/month vs $15.00/month for GPT-5.4 (xhigh) in input costs alone.
Choose GPT-5.4 (xhigh) when you need higher intelligence (57.2).
GPT-5.4 (xhigh) is cheaper at $2.50/1M input tokens vs $2.75/1M for Mistral Medium.
GPT-5.4 (xhigh) is faster, producing output at 77 tok/s compared to Mistral Medium's 73 tok/s.
No, Mistral Medium does not support image input. Neither model supports image input.
It depends on your priorities. GPT-5.4 (xhigh) scores higher on intelligence (57.2), but Mistral Medium may be better for specific use cases like budget-conscious projects or speed-critical applications.
Data last synced: March 26, 2026
| Output Modalities |
| Text |
| Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |