WizardLM-2 8x22B vs OpenAI: GPT-4o (2024-05-13): Which AI Model Is Better?

Updated March 2026· Based on independent benchmark data

Quick Verdict

WizardLM-2 8x22B is 8.1x cheaper at $0.62/1M tokens vs $5.00/1M.

Head-to-Head Comparison

MetricWizardLM-2 8x22BOpenAI: GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
Intelligence ScoreN/AN/A
Coding ScoreN/AN/A
Math ScoreN/AN/A
Speed (tok/s)N/AN/A
Latency (TTFT)N/AN/A
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.62$5.00
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.62$15
Context Window66K128K
Max Output Tokens8K4K
Input ModalitiesTextText + Image + File
Output ModalitiesTextText
Free TierNoNo

Detailed Analysis

Pricing

WizardLM-2 8x22B is more affordable at $0.62/1M input tokens ($0.62/1M output), while OpenAI: GPT-4o (2024-05-13) costs $5.00/1M input ($15/1M output). That makes OpenAI: GPT-4o (2024-05-13) 8.1x more expensive per token, which can add up significantly at scale. For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, WizardLM-2 8x22B would cost approximately $3.72/month vs $30.00/month for OpenAI: GPT-4o (2024-05-13) in input costs alone.

Context Window

OpenAI: GPT-4o (2024-05-13) offers a larger context window at 128K tokens compared to WizardLM-2 8x22B's 66K. For output length, WizardLM-2 8x22B can generate up to 8K tokens per response vs 4K for OpenAI: GPT-4o (2024-05-13).

Best Use Cases

Choose WizardLM-2 8x22B when you need lower cost.

Choose WizardLM-2 8x22B if:

  • Budget is a concern ($0.62/1M vs $5.00/1M)

Choose OpenAI: GPT-4o (2024-05-13) if:

  • You need a larger context window (128K vs 66K)
  • You need image understanding (Supports image input)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, WizardLM-2 8x22B or OpenAI: GPT-4o (2024-05-13)?

WizardLM-2 8x22B is cheaper at $0.62/1M input tokens vs $5.00/1M for OpenAI: GPT-4o (2024-05-13).

Can WizardLM-2 8x22B process images?

No, WizardLM-2 8x22B does not support image input. However, OpenAI: GPT-4o (2024-05-13) does support images.

Which has a larger context window, WizardLM-2 8x22B or OpenAI: GPT-4o (2024-05-13)?

OpenAI: GPT-4o (2024-05-13) has a larger context window at 128K compared to WizardLM-2 8x22B's 66K.

Related Comparisons

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis

Data last synced: March 2026