WizardLM-2 8x22B vs OpenAI: GPT-4o: Which AI Model Is Better?
Updated March 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
Quick Verdict
WizardLM-2 8x22B is 4.0x cheaper at $0.62/1M tokens vs $2.50/1M.
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Metric | WizardLM-2 8x22B | OpenAI: GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | N/A | N/A |
| Coding Score | N/A | N/A |
| Math Score | N/A | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | N/A | N/A |
| Latency (TTFT) | N/A | N/A |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $0.62 | $2.50 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $0.62 | $10 |
| Context Window | 66K | 128K |
| Max Output Tokens | 8K | 16K |
| Input Modalities | Text | Text + Image + File |
| Output Modalities | Text | Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |
Detailed Analysis
Pricing
WizardLM-2 8x22B is more affordable at $0.62/1M input tokens ($0.62/1M output), while OpenAI: GPT-4o costs $2.50/1M input ($10/1M output). That makes OpenAI: GPT-4o 4.0x more expensive per token, which can add up significantly at scale. For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, WizardLM-2 8x22B would cost approximately $3.72/month vs $15.00/month for OpenAI: GPT-4o in input costs alone.
Context Window
OpenAI: GPT-4o offers a larger context window at 128K tokens compared to WizardLM-2 8x22B's 66K. For output length, OpenAI: GPT-4o can generate up to 16K tokens per response vs 8K for WizardLM-2 8x22B.
Best Use Cases
Choose WizardLM-2 8x22B when you need lower cost.
Choose WizardLM-2 8x22B if:
- ✓Budget is a concern ($0.62/1M vs $2.50/1M)
Choose OpenAI: GPT-4o if:
- ✓You need a larger context window (128K vs 66K)
- ✓You need image understanding (Supports image input)
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, WizardLM-2 8x22B or OpenAI: GPT-4o?
WizardLM-2 8x22B is cheaper at $0.62/1M input tokens vs $2.50/1M for OpenAI: GPT-4o.
Can WizardLM-2 8x22B process images?
No, WizardLM-2 8x22B does not support image input. However, OpenAI: GPT-4o does support images.
Which has a larger context window, WizardLM-2 8x22B or OpenAI: GPT-4o?
OpenAI: GPT-4o has a larger context window at 128K compared to WizardLM-2 8x22B's 66K.
Related Comparisons
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis
Data last synced: March 2026