WizardLM-2 8x22B vs Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct: Which AI Model Is Better?

Updated March 2026· Based on independent benchmark data

Quick Verdict

Both WizardLM-2 8x22B and Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct are competitive AI models. See the detailed comparison below to find which best fits your needs.

Head-to-Head Comparison

MetricWizardLM-2 8x22BMeta: Llama 3 70B Instruct
Intelligence ScoreN/AN/A
Coding ScoreN/AN/A
Math ScoreN/AN/A
Speed (tok/s)N/AN/A
Latency (TTFT)N/AN/A
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.62$0.51
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.62$0.74
Context Window66K8K
Max Output Tokens8K8K
Input ModalitiesTextText
Output ModalitiesTextText
Free TierNoNo

Detailed Analysis

Pricing

Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct is more affordable at $0.51/1M input tokens ($0.74/1M output), while WizardLM-2 8x22B costs $0.62/1M input ($0.62/1M output). For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, WizardLM-2 8x22B would cost approximately $3.72/month vs $3.06/month for Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct in input costs alone.

Context Window

WizardLM-2 8x22B offers a larger context window at 66K tokens compared to Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct's 8K. This means WizardLM-2 8x22B can process roughly 33 pages of text in a single request vs 4 pages for Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct.

Best Use Cases

Choose WizardLM-2 8x22B when you need larger context window (66K).

Choose WizardLM-2 8x22B if:

  • You need a larger context window (66K vs 8K)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, WizardLM-2 8x22B or Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct?

Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct is cheaper at $0.51/1M input tokens vs $0.62/1M for WizardLM-2 8x22B.

Can WizardLM-2 8x22B process images?

No, WizardLM-2 8x22B does not support image input. Neither model supports image input.

Which has a larger context window, WizardLM-2 8x22B or Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct?

WizardLM-2 8x22B has a larger context window at 66K compared to Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct's 8K.

Related Comparisons

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis

Data last synced: March 2026