Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads in intelligence with a score of 57.2 vs 6.4. Gemma 3n E4B Instruct is 100.0x cheaper at $0.02/1M tokens vs $2.00/1M. For speed, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview wins at 113 tok/s vs 51 tok/s.
| Metric | Gemma 3n E4B Instruct | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | 6.4 | 57.2 |
| Coding Score | 4.2 | 55.5 |
| Math Score | 14.3 | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | 51 tok/s | 113 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 0.32s | 23.84s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $0.02 | $2.00 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $0.04 | $12 |
| Context Window | N/A |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview outperforms Gemma 3n E4B Instruct on the intelligence index with a score of 57.2 compared to 6.4. For coding tasks, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the edge with a coding score of 55.5 vs 4.2.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview generates output significantly faster at 113 tok/s compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instruct's 51 tok/s, making it 2.2x faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 0.32s for Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs 23.84s for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.
Gemma 3n E4B Instruct is more affordable at $0.02/1M input tokens ($0.04/1M output), while Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $2.00/1M input ($12/1M output). That makes Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 100.0x more expensive per token, which can add up significantly at scale. For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, Gemma 3n E4B Instruct would cost approximately $0.12/month vs $12.00/month for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview in input costs alone.
Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instruct when you need lower cost. Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when you need higher intelligence (57.2), stronger coding performance (55.5), faster output (113 tok/s).
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks (55.5 vs 4.2), making it the better choice for programming tasks.
Gemma 3n E4B Instruct is cheaper at $0.02/1M input tokens vs $2.00/1M for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is faster, producing output at 113 tok/s compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instruct's 51 tok/s.
No, Gemma 3n E4B Instruct does not support image input. However, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview does support images.
Data last synced: March 26, 2026
| 1.0M |
| Max Output Tokens | N/A | N/A |
| Input Modalities | Text | Audio + File + Image + Text + Video |
| Output Modalities | Text | Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |
It depends on your priorities. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on intelligence (57.2), but Gemma 3n E4B Instruct may be better for specific use cases like budget-conscious projects or speed-critical applications.