Updated March 25, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools leads in intelligence with a score of 57.2 vs 49.2. Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro is 2.0x cheaper at $1.00/1M tokens vs $2.00/1M. For speed, Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools wins at 113 tok/s vs 0 tok/s.
| Metric | Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools | Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | 57.2 | 49.2 |
| Coding Score | 55.5 | 41.4 |
| Math Score | N/A | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | 113 tok/s | 0 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 23.00s | 0.00s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $2.00 | $1.00 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $12 | $3.00 |
| Context Window | 1.0M |
Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools outperforms Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro on the Artificial Analysis intelligence index with a score of 57.2 compared to 49.2. For coding tasks, Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools has the edge with a coding score of 55.5 vs 41.4.
Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools generates output significantly faster at 113 tok/s compared to Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro's 0 tok/s, making it Infinityx faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 0.00s for Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro vs 23.00s for Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools, which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.
Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro is more affordable at $1.00/1M input tokens ($3.00/1M output), while Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools costs $2.00/1M input ($12/1M output). For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools would cost approximately $12.00/month vs $6.00/month for Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro in input costs alone.
Both models support the same context window of 1.0M tokens (approximately 524 pages of text). For output length, Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro can generate up to 131K tokens per response vs 66K for Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools.
Choose Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools when you need higher intelligence (57.2), stronger coding performance (55.5), faster output (113 tok/s). Choose Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro when you need lower cost.
Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools scores higher on coding benchmarks (55.5 vs 41.4), making it the better choice for programming tasks.
Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $1.00/1M input tokens vs $2.00/1M for Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools.
Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools is faster, producing output at 113 tok/s compared to Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro's 0 tok/s.
Yes, Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools supports image input. Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro does not support image input.
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis
Data last synced: March 25, 2026
| 1.0M |
| Max Output Tokens | 66K | 131K |
| Input Modalities | Text + Audio + Image + Video + File | Text |
| Output Modalities | Text | Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |
Both models have the same context window of 1.0M tokens.
It depends on your priorities. Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools scores higher on intelligence (57.2), but Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro may be better for specific use cases like budget-conscious projects or speed-critical applications.