Updated March 25, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4 leads in intelligence with a score of 51.7 vs 49.2. Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro is 3.0x cheaper at $1.00/1M tokens vs $3.00/1M. For speed, Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4 wins at 65 tok/s vs 0 tok/s.
| Metric | Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4 | Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | 51.7 | 49.2 |
| Coding Score | 50.9 | 41.4 |
| Math Score | N/A | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | 65 tok/s | 0 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 38.68s | 0.00s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $3.00 | $1.00 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $15 | $3.00 |
| Context Window | 200K |
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4 outperforms Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro on the Artificial Analysis intelligence index with a score of 51.7 compared to 49.2. For coding tasks, Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4 has the edge with a coding score of 50.9 vs 41.4.
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4 generates output significantly faster at 65 tok/s compared to Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro's 0 tok/s, making it Infinityx faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 0.00s for Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro vs 38.68s for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4, which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.
Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro is more affordable at $1.00/1M input tokens ($3.00/1M output), while Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4 costs $3.00/1M input ($15/1M output). That makes Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4 3.0x more expensive per token, which can add up significantly at scale. For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4 would cost approximately $18.00/month vs $6.00/month for Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro in input costs alone.
Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro offers a larger context window at 1.0M tokens compared to Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4's 200K. This means Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro can process roughly 524 pages of text in a single request vs 100 pages for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4. For output length, Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro can generate up to 131K tokens per response vs 64K for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.
Choose Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4 when you need higher intelligence (51.7), stronger coding performance (50.9), faster output (65 tok/s). Choose Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro when you need lower cost, larger context window (1.0M).
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks (50.9 vs 41.4), making it the better choice for programming tasks.
Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $1.00/1M input tokens vs $3.00/1M for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4 is faster, producing output at 65 tok/s compared to Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro's 0 tok/s.
Yes, Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4 supports image input. Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro does not support image input.
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis
Data last synced: March 25, 2026
| 1.0M |
| Max Output Tokens | 64K | 131K |
| Input Modalities | Image + Text + File | Text |
| Output Modalities | Text | Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |
Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro has a larger context window at 1.0M compared to Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4's 200K.
It depends on your priorities. Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4 scores higher on intelligence (51.7), but Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro may be better for specific use cases like budget-conscious projects or speed-critical applications.