Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) leads in intelligence with a score of 51.7 vs 49.2. MiMo-V2-Pro is 3.0x cheaper at $1.00/1M tokens vs $3.00/1M.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | 51.7 | 49.2 |
| Coding Score | 50.9 | 41.4 |
| Math Score | N/A | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | 71 tok/s | 91 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 32.16s | 1.55s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $3.00 | $1.00 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $15 | $3.00 |
| Context Window |
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) outperforms MiMo-V2-Pro on the intelligence index with a score of 51.7 compared to 49.2. For coding tasks, Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) has the edge with a coding score of 50.9 vs 41.4.
MiMo-V2-Pro generates output significantly faster at 91 tok/s compared to Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)'s 71 tok/s, making it 1.3x faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 1.55s for MiMo-V2-Pro vs 32.16s for Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort), which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.
MiMo-V2-Pro is more affordable at $1.00/1M input tokens ($3.00/1M output), while Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) costs $3.00/1M input ($15/1M output). That makes Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) 3.0x more expensive per token, which can add up significantly at scale. For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) would cost approximately $18.00/month vs $6.00/month for MiMo-V2-Pro in input costs alone.
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) when you need higher intelligence (51.7), stronger coding performance (50.9). Choose MiMo-V2-Pro when you need lower cost.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) scores higher on coding benchmarks (50.9 vs 41.4), making it the better choice for programming tasks.
MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $1.00/1M input tokens vs $3.00/1M for Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort).
MiMo-V2-Pro is faster, producing output at 91 tok/s compared to Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)'s 71 tok/s.
No, Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) does not support image input. Neither model supports image input.
Data last synced: March 26, 2026
| N/A |
| N/A |
| Max Output Tokens | N/A | N/A |
| Input Modalities | Text | Text |
| Output Modalities | Text | Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |
It depends on your priorities. Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) scores higher on intelligence (51.7), but MiMo-V2-Pro may be better for specific use cases like budget-conscious projects or speed-critical applications.