Updated March 25, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 and OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat are virtually tied on intelligence (53.0 vs 51.3). OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat is 8.6x cheaper at $1.75/1M tokens vs $15/1M. For speed, OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat wins at 69 tok/s vs 48 tok/s.
| Metric | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 | OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | 53.0 | 51.3 |
| Coding Score | 48.1 | 48.7 |
| Math Score | N/A | 99.0 |
| Speed (tok/s) | 48 tok/s | 69 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 11.42s | 72.74s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $15 | $1.75 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $75 | $14 |
| Context Window | 200K |
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 and OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat perform similarly on overall intelligence, scoring 53.0 and 51.3 respectively. Their coding capabilities are closely matched (48.1 vs 48.7).
OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat generates output significantly faster at 69 tok/s compared to Anthropic: Claude Opus 4's 48 tok/s, making it 1.4x faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 11.42s for Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 vs 72.74s for OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat, which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.
OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat is more affordable at $1.75/1M input tokens ($14/1M output), while Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 costs $15/1M input ($75/1M output). That makes Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 8.6x more expensive per token, which can add up significantly at scale. For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 would cost approximately $90.00/month vs $10.50/month for OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat in input costs alone.
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 offers a larger context window at 200K tokens compared to OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat's 128K. For output length, Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 can generate up to 32K tokens per response vs 16K for OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat.
Choose OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat when you need faster output (69 tok/s), lower cost.
OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks (48.7 vs 48.1), making it the better choice for programming tasks.
OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat is cheaper at $1.75/1M input tokens vs $15/1M for Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.
OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat is faster, producing output at 69 tok/s compared to Anthropic: Claude Opus 4's 48 tok/s.
Yes, Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 supports image input. OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat also supports images.
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis
Data last synced: March 25, 2026
| 128K |
| Max Output Tokens | 32K | 16K |
| Input Modalities | Image + Text + File | File + Image + Text |
| Output Modalities | Text | Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 has a larger context window at 200K compared to OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat's 128K.
Both models perform similarly on intelligence benchmarks. Choose based on specific needs: pricing, speed, context window, or provider ecosystem.