Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) leads in intelligence with a score of 53.0 vs 47.7. GPT-5.1 (high) is 4.0x cheaper at $1.25/1M tokens vs $5.00/1M. For speed, GPT-5.1 (high) wins at 92 tok/s vs 51 tok/s.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) | GPT-5.1 (high) |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | 53.0 | 47.7 |
| Coding Score | 48.1 | 44.7 |
| Math Score | N/A | 94.0 |
| Speed (tok/s) | 51 tok/s | 92 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 12.63s | 39.04s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $5.00 | $1.25 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $25 | $10 |
| Context Window |
Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) outperforms GPT-5.1 (high) on the intelligence index with a score of 53.0 compared to 47.7. For coding tasks, Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) has the edge with a coding score of 48.1 vs 44.7.
GPT-5.1 (high) generates output significantly faster at 92 tok/s compared to Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)'s 51 tok/s, making it 1.8x faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 12.63s for Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) vs 39.04s for GPT-5.1 (high), which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.
GPT-5.1 (high) is more affordable at $1.25/1M input tokens ($10/1M output), while Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) costs $5.00/1M input ($25/1M output). That makes Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) 4.0x more expensive per token, which can add up significantly at scale. For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) would cost approximately $30.00/month vs $7.50/month for GPT-5.1 (high) in input costs alone.
Choose Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) when you need higher intelligence (53.0), stronger coding performance (48.1). Choose GPT-5.1 (high) when you need faster output (92 tok/s), lower cost.
Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) scores higher on coding benchmarks (48.1 vs 44.7), making it the better choice for programming tasks.
GPT-5.1 (high) is cheaper at $1.25/1M input tokens vs $5.00/1M for Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort).
GPT-5.1 (high) is faster, producing output at 92 tok/s compared to Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)'s 51 tok/s.
No, Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) does not support image input. Neither model supports image input.
Data last synced: March 26, 2026
| N/A |
| N/A |
| Max Output Tokens | N/A | N/A |
| Input Modalities | Text | Text |
| Output Modalities | Text | Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |
It depends on your priorities. Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) scores higher on intelligence (53.0), but GPT-5.1 (high) may be better for specific use cases like budget-conscious projects or speed-critical applications.