Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) and GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) are virtually tied on intelligence (49.7 vs 49.0). GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) is 2.9x cheaper at $1.75/1M tokens vs $5.00/1M. For speed, GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) wins at 99 tok/s vs 57 tok/s.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) | GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | 49.7 | 49.0 |
| Coding Score | 47.8 | 43.0 |
| Math Score | 91.3 | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | 57 tok/s | 99 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 10.41s | 6.86s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $5.00 | $1.75 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $25 | $14 |
| Context Window | N/A |
Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) and GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) perform similarly on overall intelligence, scoring 49.7 and 49.0 respectively. For coding tasks, Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) has the edge with a coding score of 47.8 vs 43.0.
GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) generates output significantly faster at 99 tok/s compared to Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)'s 57 tok/s, making it 1.7x faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 6.86s for GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) vs 10.41s for Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning), which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.
GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) is more affordable at $1.75/1M input tokens ($14/1M output), while Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) costs $5.00/1M input ($25/1M output). That makes Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) 2.9x more expensive per token, which can add up significantly at scale. For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) would cost approximately $30.00/month vs $10.50/month for GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) in input costs alone.
Choose Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) when you need stronger coding performance (47.8). Choose GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) when you need faster output (99 tok/s), lower cost.
Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) scores higher on coding benchmarks (47.8 vs 43.0), making it the better choice for programming tasks.
GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) is cheaper at $1.75/1M input tokens vs $5.00/1M for Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning).
GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) is faster, producing output at 99 tok/s compared to Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)'s 57 tok/s.
No, Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) does not support image input. Neither model supports image input.
Data last synced: March 26, 2026
| N/A |
| Max Output Tokens | N/A | N/A |
| Input Modalities | Text | Text |
| Output Modalities | Text | Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |
Both models perform similarly on intelligence benchmarks. Choose based on specific needs: pricing, speed, context window, or provider ecosystem.