Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads in intelligence with a score of 57.2 vs 39.0. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 7.5x cheaper at $2.00/1M tokens vs $15/1M. For speed, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview wins at 113 tok/s vs 38 tok/s.
| Metric | Claude 4 Opus (Reasoning) | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | 39.0 | 57.2 |
| Coding Score | 34.0 | 55.5 |
| Math Score | 73.3 | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | 38 tok/s | 113 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 8.05s | 23.84s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $15 | $2.00 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $75 | $12 |
| Context Window | N/A |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview outperforms Claude 4 Opus (Reasoning) on the intelligence index with a score of 57.2 compared to 39.0. For coding tasks, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the edge with a coding score of 55.5 vs 34.0.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview generates output significantly faster at 113 tok/s compared to Claude 4 Opus (Reasoning)'s 38 tok/s, making it 3.0x faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 8.05s for Claude 4 Opus (Reasoning) vs 23.84s for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is more affordable at $2.00/1M input tokens ($12/1M output), while Claude 4 Opus (Reasoning) costs $15/1M input ($75/1M output). That makes Claude 4 Opus (Reasoning) 7.5x more expensive per token, which can add up significantly at scale. For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, Claude 4 Opus (Reasoning) would cost approximately $90.00/month vs $12.00/month for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview in input costs alone.
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when you need higher intelligence (57.2), stronger coding performance (55.5), faster output (113 tok/s), lower cost.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks (55.5 vs 34.0), making it the better choice for programming tasks.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is cheaper at $2.00/1M input tokens vs $15/1M for Claude 4 Opus (Reasoning).
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is faster, producing output at 113 tok/s compared to Claude 4 Opus (Reasoning)'s 38 tok/s.
No, Claude 4 Opus (Reasoning) does not support image input. However, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview does support images.
Data last synced: March 26, 2026
| 1.0M |
| Max Output Tokens | N/A | N/A |
| Input Modalities | Text | Audio + File + Image + Text + Video |
| Output Modalities | Text | Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |
It depends on your priorities. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on intelligence (57.2), but Claude 4 Opus (Reasoning) may be better for specific use cases like budget-conscious projects or speed-critical applications.