Goliath 120B vs OpenAI: GPT-4o: Which AI Model Is Better?

Updated March 2026· Based on independent benchmark data

Quick Verdict

Both Goliath 120B and OpenAI: GPT-4o are competitive AI models. See the detailed comparison below to find which best fits your needs.

Head-to-Head Comparison

MetricGoliath 120BOpenAI: GPT-4o
Intelligence ScoreN/AN/A
Coding ScoreN/AN/A
Math ScoreN/AN/A
Speed (tok/s)N/AN/A
Latency (TTFT)N/AN/A
Input Price / 1M tokens$3.75$2.50
Output Price / 1M tokens$7.50$10
Context Window6K128K
Max Output Tokens1K16K
Input ModalitiesTextText + Image + File
Output ModalitiesTextText
Free TierNoNo

Detailed Analysis

Pricing

OpenAI: GPT-4o is more affordable at $2.50/1M input tokens ($10/1M output), while Goliath 120B costs $3.75/1M input ($7.50/1M output). For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, Goliath 120B would cost approximately $22.50/month vs $15.00/month for OpenAI: GPT-4o in input costs alone.

Context Window

OpenAI: GPT-4o offers a larger context window at 128K tokens compared to Goliath 120B's 6K. This means OpenAI: GPT-4o can process roughly 64 pages of text in a single request vs 3 pages for Goliath 120B. For output length, OpenAI: GPT-4o can generate up to 16K tokens per response vs 1K for Goliath 120B.

Best Use Cases

Choose OpenAI: GPT-4o when you need larger context window (128K).

Choose OpenAI: GPT-4o if:

  • You need a larger context window (128K vs 6K)
  • You need image understanding (Supports image input)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Goliath 120B or OpenAI: GPT-4o?

OpenAI: GPT-4o is cheaper at $2.50/1M input tokens vs $3.75/1M for Goliath 120B.

Can Goliath 120B process images?

No, Goliath 120B does not support image input. However, OpenAI: GPT-4o does support images.

Which has a larger context window, Goliath 120B or OpenAI: GPT-4o?

OpenAI: GPT-4o has a larger context window at 128K compared to Goliath 120B's 6K.

Related Comparisons

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis

Data last synced: March 2026