Goliath 120B vs Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct: Which AI Model Is Better?

Updated March 2026· Based on independent benchmark data

Quick Verdict

Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct is 7.4x cheaper at $0.51/1M tokens vs $3.75/1M.

Head-to-Head Comparison

MetricGoliath 120BMeta: Llama 3 70B Instruct
Intelligence ScoreN/AN/A
Coding ScoreN/AN/A
Math ScoreN/AN/A
Speed (tok/s)N/AN/A
Latency (TTFT)N/AN/A
Input Price / 1M tokens$3.75$0.51
Output Price / 1M tokens$7.50$0.74
Context Window6K8K
Max Output Tokens1K8K
Input ModalitiesTextText
Output ModalitiesTextText
Free TierNoNo

Detailed Analysis

Pricing

Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct is more affordable at $0.51/1M input tokens ($0.74/1M output), while Goliath 120B costs $3.75/1M input ($7.50/1M output). That makes Goliath 120B 7.4x more expensive per token, which can add up significantly at scale. For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, Goliath 120B would cost approximately $22.50/month vs $3.06/month for Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct in input costs alone.

Context Window

Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct offers a larger context window at 8K tokens compared to Goliath 120B's 6K. For output length, Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct can generate up to 8K tokens per response vs 1K for Goliath 120B.

Best Use Cases

Choose Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct when you need lower cost.

Choose Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct if:

  • Budget is a concern ($0.51/1M vs $3.75/1M)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Goliath 120B or Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct?

Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct is cheaper at $0.51/1M input tokens vs $3.75/1M for Goliath 120B.

Can Goliath 120B process images?

No, Goliath 120B does not support image input. Neither model supports image input.

Which has a larger context window, Goliath 120B or Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct?

Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct has a larger context window at 8K compared to Goliath 120B's 6K.

Related Comparisons

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis

Data last synced: March 2026