Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
GPT-5.4 (xhigh) leads in intelligence with a score of 57.2 vs 20.8. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is 3.6x cheaper at $0.70/1M tokens vs $2.50/1M. For speed, GPT-5.4 (xhigh) wins at 77 tok/s vs 57 tok/s.
| Metric | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct | GPT-5.4 (xhigh) |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | 20.8 | 57.2 |
| Coding Score | 16.5 | 57.3 |
| Math Score | 70.7 | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | 57 tok/s | 77 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 1.04s | 181.82s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $0.70 | $2.50 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $2.80 | $15 |
| Context Window | N/A |
GPT-5.4 (xhigh) outperforms Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct on the intelligence index with a score of 57.2 compared to 20.8. For coding tasks, GPT-5.4 (xhigh) has the edge with a coding score of 57.3 vs 16.5.
GPT-5.4 (xhigh) generates output significantly faster at 77 tok/s compared to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's 57 tok/s, making it 1.3x faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 1.04s for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct vs 181.82s for GPT-5.4 (xhigh), which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is more affordable at $0.70/1M input tokens ($2.80/1M output), while GPT-5.4 (xhigh) costs $2.50/1M input ($15/1M output). That makes GPT-5.4 (xhigh) 3.6x more expensive per token, which can add up significantly at scale. For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct would cost approximately $4.20/month vs $15.00/month for GPT-5.4 (xhigh) in input costs alone.
Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct when you need lower cost. Choose GPT-5.4 (xhigh) when you need higher intelligence (57.2), stronger coding performance (57.3), faster output (77 tok/s).
GPT-5.4 (xhigh) scores higher on coding benchmarks (57.3 vs 16.5), making it the better choice for programming tasks.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is cheaper at $0.70/1M input tokens vs $2.50/1M for GPT-5.4 (xhigh).
GPT-5.4 (xhigh) is faster, producing output at 77 tok/s compared to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's 57 tok/s.
No, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct does not support image input. Neither model supports image input.
Data last synced: March 26, 2026
| N/A |
| Max Output Tokens | N/A | N/A |
| Input Modalities | Text | Text |
| Output Modalities | Text | Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |
It depends on your priorities. GPT-5.4 (xhigh) scores higher on intelligence (57.2), but Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct may be better for specific use cases like budget-conscious projects or speed-critical applications.