Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads in intelligence with a score of 57.2 vs 26.7. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) is 4.0x cheaper at $0.50/1M tokens vs $2.00/1M.
| Metric | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | 26.7 | 57.2 |
| Coding Score | 19.5 | 55.5 |
| Math Score | 84.3 | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | 142 tok/s | 113 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 1.03s | 23.84s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $0.50 | $2.00 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $6.00 | $12 |
| Context Window | N/A |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview outperforms Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) on the intelligence index with a score of 57.2 compared to 26.7. For coding tasks, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the edge with a coding score of 55.5 vs 19.5.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) generates output significantly faster at 142 tok/s compared to Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's 113 tok/s, making it 1.3x faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 1.03s for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) vs 23.84s for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) is more affordable at $0.50/1M input tokens ($6.00/1M output), while Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $2.00/1M input ($12/1M output). That makes Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 4.0x more expensive per token, which can add up significantly at scale. For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) would cost approximately $3.00/month vs $12.00/month for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview in input costs alone.
Choose Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) when you need lower cost. Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when you need higher intelligence (57.2), stronger coding performance (55.5).
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks (55.5 vs 19.5), making it the better choice for programming tasks.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) is cheaper at $0.50/1M input tokens vs $2.00/1M for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) is faster, producing output at 142 tok/s compared to Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's 113 tok/s.
No, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) does not support image input. However, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview does support images.
Data last synced: March 26, 2026
| 1.0M |
| Max Output Tokens | N/A | N/A |
| Input Modalities | Text | Audio + File + Image + Text + Video |
| Output Modalities | Text | Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |
It depends on your priorities. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on intelligence (57.2), but Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) may be better for specific use cases like budget-conscious projects or speed-critical applications.