Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads in intelligence with a score of 57.2 vs 12.0. Qwen2.5 Turbo is 40.0x cheaper at $0.05/1M tokens vs $2.00/1M. For speed, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview wins at 113 tok/s vs 62 tok/s.
| Metric | Qwen2.5 Turbo | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | 12.0 | 57.2 |
| Coding Score | N/A | 55.5 |
| Math Score | N/A | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | 62 tok/s | 113 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 1.03s | 23.84s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $0.05 | $2.00 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $0.20 | $12 |
| Context Window | N/A | 1.0M |
| Max Output Tokens | N/A | N/A |
| Input Modalities | Text | Audio + File + Image + Text + Video |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview outperforms Qwen2.5 Turbo on the intelligence index with a score of 57.2 compared to 12.0.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview generates output significantly faster at 113 tok/s compared to Qwen2.5 Turbo's 62 tok/s, making it 1.8x faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 1.03s for Qwen2.5 Turbo vs 23.84s for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.
Qwen2.5 Turbo is more affordable at $0.05/1M input tokens ($0.20/1M output), while Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $2.00/1M input ($12/1M output). That makes Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 40.0x more expensive per token, which can add up significantly at scale. For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, Qwen2.5 Turbo would cost approximately $0.30/month vs $12.00/month for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview in input costs alone.
Choose Qwen2.5 Turbo when you need lower cost. Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when you need higher intelligence (57.2), faster output (113 tok/s).
Qwen2.5 Turbo is cheaper at $0.05/1M input tokens vs $2.00/1M for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is faster, producing output at 113 tok/s compared to Qwen2.5 Turbo's 62 tok/s.
No, Qwen2.5 Turbo does not support image input. However, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview does support images.
It depends on your priorities. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on intelligence (57.2), but Qwen2.5 Turbo may be better for specific use cases like budget-conscious projects or speed-critical applications.
Data last synced: March 26, 2026
| Output Modalities |
| Text |
| Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |